A number produced without questions should be treated as a warning, e-governance software development not a service level. An experienced provider responds with clarifying questions before any number: react native app development company about who owns the data and what happens on failure. A vendor that prices without asking anything is simply working from a template, and a guess will be corrected later — on your budget.
Be wary of a gap between the engineers on the sales call and the people who will code. Ask for the names and CVs of the actual team in the agreement, with a clause about substitutions. A team that will only describe abstract roles and refuses to name people is reserving the option to staff you with whoever is free.
Ask for the source repository from the first week. A provider that delivers nothing between demos is inviting you to trust a black box. Daily commits reveal the actual pace far better than a slide deck. The same holds for the build and deployment setup: if nothing runs automatically, assurances about quality are unverifiable.
Vague phrasing around intellectual property is not an accident. The agreement needs to state plainly that the code, designs and documentation transfer to the client upon settlement of the relevant invoice. Look too at which country’s law applies and the milestone terms: a large upfront payment with no milestone tied to it removes the only leverage you have.
Finally, look at the working rhythm. Establish how much working-time overlap there will be with your timezone, which named person handles your questions and how quickly. A few hours of overlap is normally sufficient; no overlap turns each small question into a lost day. Careless writing in the proposal rarely improves under delivery pressure.
Recent Comments