A quote that comes back within a day is a bad sign. Any serious team will come back with a list of questions: about who owns the data and web application development agency what happens on failure. A provider that commits to a figure without asking anything is pricing a guess, laravel vs .net comparison and a guess resurfaces as a change order — at your expense.
Be wary of a gap difference between laravel and symfony the team in the pitch and the developers actually assigned. Ask for specific people rather than roles in the statement of work, with a clause covering replacement. A provider that only offers abstract roles and will not commit to people is reserving the option to staff you with whoever is free.
Insist on the source repository from the start. A provider that delivers code only at milestones expects you to take delivery on faith. Visible commits tell you how many people are really working far better than a slide deck. The same holds for the automated test suite: if it does not exist, quality claims remain unverifiable.
Vague contract language around IP is rarely an oversight. The agreement should state plainly that all deliverables become the property of your business upon settlement of the relevant invoice. Look too at which country’s law applies and the milestone terms: heavy prepayment with nothing due in return for weeks eliminates any leverage you would otherwise keep.
Lastly, pay attention to communication. Establish how much working-time overlap the teams will share each day, who handles day-to-day questions and on what response times. Some genuine overlap is usually enough; no overlap stretches each small question into a twenty-four hour round trip. Sloppy written English in the sales phase rarely improves once the work starts.
Recent Comments